Sort by: Top
Feed post
Suggested
Reservation for the Needy First : CJI Gavai’s Remarks Ignite Discussion —— Chief Justice of India B.R. Gavai said that the children of wealthy or high-ranking officials, like IAS officers, should not be treated the same as children of poor agricultural labourers when it comes to reservations. He stressed that reservations are meant for those who are still socially and educationally disadvantaged. He explained that the aim of affirmative action is to help families who have not yet received real opportunities. Those who already have strong economic or social advantages should not take away benefits from the truly needy. The CJI referred to the "creamy layer" rule used for OBCs, where better-off families are excluded so benefits reach the poorest. He suggested that a similar idea may need to be considered for Scheduled Castes to ensure fairness. This concept comes from the Supreme Court's 1992 Indra Sawhney judgment, which said that advanced individuals within backward classes should not get quota benefits. The goal was to make sure reservations help those who genuinely require support. Gavai made these remarks at an event on India and the Constitution, sparking debate among legal and policy experts. Applying the creamy-layer rule to SCs would be a major change, raising constitutional issues and affecting who qualifies for reservations. In simple terms, the CJI said reservation resources should first reach those who are truly marginalised like children of farm labourers. Giving the same benefits to high-income or high-status families, he noted, goes against the purpose of the policy.
1,819 reactions
135 comments
•
46 reposts
Feed post
Alok Tiwari likes this
MISCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE OR MISUSE OF PROCEDURES SERIES
POST 3- When Due Process Fails - Lessons from the Aarushi Talwar Murder Case
The Aarushi Talwar case remains one of the most tragic and controversial investigations in India’s recent history. In May 2008, 14-year-old Aarushi and the family’s domestic help, Hemraj, were found brutally murdered in their Noida home. What should have been a careful search for truth quickly became entangled in investigative failures, media frenzy, and legal battles.
Right from the beginning, the investigation suffered serious lapses. The crime scene was poorly secured, leading to contamination and destruction of vital evidence, made worse by delays in discovering Hemraj’s body, which was found two days later. This mishandling severely compromised forensic analysis, crucial for solving any murder case.
As the probe advanced, police turned their attention sharply towards Aarushi’s parents, Dr. Rajesh and Nupur Talwar, without solid evidence. Interrogations, lie detector and narco-analysis tests were conducted under intense public pressure, while other leads were neglected. The police pushed a theory of "honour killing," based on questionable assumptions rather than facts, undermining the objectivity of the investigation.
Most damaging was the failure to follow proper forensic procedures and safeguard evidence. Missing fingerprints, lost DNA material, inconsistent autopsy reports, and suppression of findings, particularly regarding sexual assault fractured the credibility of the case. Instead of a scientific inquiry, the narrative became clouded by speculation, ultimately failing to hold up in court.
When the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) took over the case, hope was renewed. Still, years of legal battles ensued. The Talwar’s were initially cleared, then charged, convicted on circumstantial evidence in 2013, only to be acquitted by the Allahabad High Court in 2017. The court’s decision underscored the grave investigative and prosecutorial failures that plagued the case from its inception.
Beyond the heartbreak of two lives lost, the Aarushi Talwar case stands as a stark reminder of how investigative negligence can cause irreparable damage to justice. It highlights the critical need for unbiased, thorough, and scientific investigations. Without this, the very foundation of justice is shaken, leaving victims, families, and society with a bitter sense of betrayal.
Justice delayed and distorted is justice denied. Until our systems uphold transparency and accountability, such injustices will persist. The Aarushi Talwar case reminds us of our duty to truth and justice.
#JusticeForAarushi #CriminalJusticeReform #TruthAndAccountability #ForensicScienceMatters #IndianJudiciary #MiscarriageOfJustice #JusticeDelayed #PoliceAccountability #ForensicInvestigation #NoidaMurderCase #AarushiTalwar #VictimsRights
Alok Tiwari and 2 others reacted
Feed post
Suggested
Why Dressing Neatly Matters in Courtrooms In the legal profession, our first impression often speaks long before we do. One of the most underrated yet powerful aspects of advocacy is how we present ourselves in court. Why does dressing neatly matter? Because the courtroom is not just a place of argument — it is a space of discipline, order, and respect. A well-kept appearance communicates that we value the institution, the judge, the opposing counsel, and most importantly, our client. How professional dressing influences advocacy ⚖️ Projects Credibility: Before we open our file or present our case, our appearance already conveys seriousness, preparedness, and attention to detail. Builds Confidence: When we’re dressed neatly, we feel composed. That confidence reflects in our submissions, body language, and the way we handle the court’s questions. Upholds the Dignity of the Court: Courtrooms represent the highest values of justice. Dressing with care is our way of honoring that responsibility. Sets the Tone for the Profession: Young lawyers often learn from what they observe. Being well-dressed reinforces a culture of discipline and inspires professionalism. Reduces Distraction: Neat, appropriate attire ensures the focus stays on the merits of the case — not the lawyer’s appearance. Ultimately, advocacy is not only about what we say, but also how we represent the profession.
Bhargab Jyoti Bordoloi and 58 others reacted
4 comments
Today’s puzzles
LinkedIn Corporation © 2025